Do Republicans Have A Healthcare Reform Solution?

Last week, President Obama stood in front of Republicans in Congress to propose and effectiveness of their policies have dared to think about health care reform. After losing a few bruises on the elections, Democrats, Republicans have tried, as "no party" The party is simply against any democratic politics without information about your own decisions. Only the Republican Congress in the general right to vote, either version of the law, the submission was relatively easy to create. Of course, they do not believe that the current situation of health insurance was perfect.

Now, Top House Republican John Boehner called his bluff. He recently announced plans for a GOP alternative to health reform. According to Bonner, the Bill of his party to do more to reduce health costs, while maintaining Medicare and avoid higher taxes and budget spending. He also stressed the fact that the Republicans had their own suggestions for a few months, but they are in favor of intra-party disputes between Democrats ignored.

In fact, Republicans in the House legislation to give more Americans health insurance. Comparing the Democratic plan is much cheaper. Non-Congressional Budget Office estimated that the cost of only $ 61 billion over 10 years. Nevertheless, the legislation was enacted, the House Democrats in the price of more than $ 1 billion over this period. Senate version just below that mark. One of the reasons for the lower cost, that there is no insurance subsidies. In addition, the mandate of health insurance (most people buy an insurance policy that would require) is not available. Not surprisingly, since this provision was very controversial, and as unconstitutional in some circles. With the Republican attorneys general threatened to sue the federal government if the mandate adopted. If this Republican led reforms adopted in place, so that their problems would be moot.

In his pro-business Republican bill contains less regulation of health insurance is that the Democratic bill. He also said Republicans have proposed a number of provisions in the past. Instead of promoting the establishment of state-regulated market for the exchange of health insurance for competition in the industry, the Republicans think it's a better idea about the restrictions it imposes on the state to sell individual health insurance companies. Some states have more restrictions on coverage includes, such as health insurance for various health problems. For example, some states mandate that all health insurance sold within its borders, to ensure coverage of mental health, and not in others. In many cases, self-employed health insurance is more expensive in these countries, more complete coverage. Upon the sale of insurance are allowed between states, people will be able to isolate or health insurance for students, which provides a degree of protection they need, no more, no less. This will allow them to start saving and money.

Of course, the reform of medical liability was an important part of the legislation. Instead of downplaying the health insurance companies, Republicans prefer to trial lawyers, responsible for the rising cost of health insurance. Without strict limits on the amount of money which may be granted in cases of medical malpractice (especially the jury's decision), doctors are forced to practice defensive medicine: in other words, they are Don 'more tests and procedures that were not necessary medical to be done. Otherwise, they may lead to prosecution if something goes wrong. Many doctors have left because of the millions of dollars on professional responsibility, they must respond to the judgments in practice. The shortage of practitioners, especially physicians, the results for the remainder of price increases on them. These costs are passed on to the public in the form of premiums for health insurance individually, so that millions of uninsured Americans, because they can not afford to buy.

Even in his weakened political position to consider the Democrats, Republicans barely taken into account. Some are skeptical about whether it can provide genuine health reform: Although it has much less impact on the deficit, it has fewer features and effectiveness. The democratic system, as expected, access to health insurance for 30 million Americans, perhaps the Republican plan is just 3 million. Without undocumented immigrants do not apply to the proposals of both parties) (many Americans are still uninsured. Another question is whether the public are more interested in reforming health care in the GOP field of democratic reforms? Increase in the proportion of people aware of the debate was so tired.